Source: DRM2: Cultural Studies
2C-EV: >70%,
C-EV: 100%
Author: Myself
3-Dimensional Model: Click Here [Archive] [G-Archive] [Archive.is] [Perma.cc]
Tacit Binder: Process, Mean, Codification, Form
Major Node: Form, Process, Cultural, Colonial, Codification (Note: relative majors (nested), among minor nodes)
Major Node: Form, Process, Cultural, Colonial, Codification (Note: relative majors (nested), among minor nodes)
Unknown::Labels::Model::Form[::Academic]::Colonial::Codification[Static::Cultivation, Static::Medium, Existing::Statically, Existing::System]::Systems::Involving::Forms::Developing::DeColonial::Institutional::Capacity::Dynamic::Arrangement::Arbitrary::Tacit::Process[Entropy::Global::Economic, Medium::Static, Cohesion::Global]::Cultural
(Note: Intermediary nodes can be traced for more conceptual insight.)
Unlike libriatics.org, I will exhibit aspects of the modeling process, as if we are students in a future (is now) culture's academic institution. The words are nodes interacting dynamically among arrangements employing capacities that static cultivation lacks. So this initial model, while stable, could have nodes that do not work in relation to the corpus but instead in relation to metadata, for example. So a way of checking this is running concordances on terms to cross-check.
In the initial model, I am already familiar with what will be the corpus and the metadata. I follow that the head of the informatic model needs to be revised. However, that means I will need to run another model after editing out the metadata nodes. Think of the model, for learning purposes, as an informatic bonsai tree of sorts. There is a newer type of dimensional form to one's relation with the language involving dynamic arrangement. There is a discernible form that, like colonial writing, a person can review to critically consider, determine, and edit within a needed context. The model here needs to align with the nodes referencing the corpus, not the metadata. I have cross-checked and understand the edits, and then I conduct a second modeling based on the edits, which is the following:
Source: DRM2: Cultural Studies
2C-EV: >70%,
C-EV: 100%
Author: Myself
3-Dimensional Model: Click Here [Archive] [G-Archive] [Archive.is] [Perma.cc]
Tacit Binder: Process, Mean, Codification, Form
Major Node: Form, Process, Cultural, Colonial, Codification (Note: relative majors (nested), among minor nodes)
Major Node: Form, Process, Cultural, Colonial, Codification (Note: relative majors (nested), among minor nodes)
Structural::Form::Academic::Colonial::Codification::Disrupt::Ironically::Capitalist::Systems::Involving::Forms::Developing::DeColonial::Institutional::Enhanced::Capacity::Dynamic::Arrangement::Arbitrary::Tacit::Process[::Entropy::Global::Economic, Medium::Static, ::Static::Cultivations::Gutting, ::Cohesion::Global]::Cultural::Studies::Emphasizes[::Embodiment]::Culture::Industry::Replace::Individuality[::Pseudo]
Non-Hierarchical Model: Click Here [Archive][G-Archive][Archive.is][Perma.cc]
(Note: Intermediary nodes can be traced for more conceptual insight.)
Considerations: The model is stable, so edits and remodeling will correspond. Here, I simply wanted to show a little of the process with unstructured information. The process differs from presentations of information being simplified, structured, and run through what could be considered "a magic machine" technique, where the process isn't to be known or understood. Rather, a result emerges, like magic, from the inactive result, which simply works, post-justification. The informatic, working with unstructured information, not simplified, emphasizes the interactive process, where people can review all stages of the process and, among self-and-peer review of that information, make decisions involving the prejustified-authoritative context, among a need for a meeting of the mind(s) first and foremost, to set some kind of needed foundation, a stabilizing basis, for people and their processes, utilizing this unstructured information with dynamic capacity. Again, with this type of informatic approach involving unstructured information, people and their processes are emphasized inherently. This process wouldn't ever aim to be, nor would unstructured information permit, a magic-machine method. All stages can be reviewed as thoroughly and carefully as needed. The model can be edited in a manner that, as an analogy, seems somewhat similar to pruning a virtual bonsai tree of sorts, where the informatic "designer" is able to achieve a particular normed precision as people share in the modeling and method process together, cross-checking each stage.
